Geneva Catechism (341 - 350)

Proofs | Search | Previous | Contents | Next


Q. 341. Does not the manner of receiving consist in faith?

A. I admit it does. But I at the same time add, that this is done when we not only believe that he died in order to free us from death, and was raised up that he might purchase life for us, but recognise that he dwells in us, and that we are united to him by a union the same in kind as that which unites the members to the head, that by virtue of this union we may become partakers of all his blessings.


Q. 342. Do we obtain this communion by the Supper alone?

A. No, indeed. For by the gospel also, as Paul declares, Christ is communicated to us. And Paul justly declares this, seeing we are there told that we are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones-that he is the living bread which came down from heaven to nourish our souls-that we are one with him as he is one with the Father, &c. (1 Cor. i. 6; Eph. v. 30; John vi. 51; John xvii. 21.)


Q. 343. What more do we obtain from the sacrament, or what other benefit does it confer upon us?

A. The communion of which I spoke is thereby confirmed and increased; for although Christ is exhibited to us both in baptism and in the gospel, we do not however receive him entire, but in part only.


Q. 344. What then have we in the symbol of bread?

A. As the body of Christ was once sacrificed for us to reconcile us to God, so now also is it given to us, that we may certainly know that reconciliation belongs to us.


Q. 345. What in the symbol of wine?

A. That as Christ once shed his blood for the satisfaction of our sins, and as the price of our redemption, so he now also gives it to us to drink, that we may feel the benefit which should thence accrue to us.


Q. 346. According to these two answers, the holy Supper of the Lord refers us to his death, that we may communicate in its virtue?

A. Wholly so; for then the one perpetual sacrifice, sufficient for our salvation, was performed. Hence nothing more remains for us but to enjoy it.


Q. 347. The Supper then was not instituted in order to offer up to God the body of his Son?

A. By no means. He himself alone, as priest for ever, has this privilege; and so his words express when he says, "Take, eat." He there commands us not to offer his body, but only to eat it. (Heb. v. 10; Matt. xxvi. 26.)


Q. 348. Why do we use two signs?

A. Therein the Lord consulted our weakness, teaching us in a more familiar manner that he is not only food to our souls, but drink also, so that we are not to seek any part of spiritual life anywhere else than in him alone.


Q. 349. Ought all without exception to use both alike?

A. So the commandment of Christ bears: and to derogate from it in any way, by attempting anything contrary to it, is wicked.


Q. 350. Have we in the Supper only a figure of the benefits which you have mentioned, or are they there exhibited to us reality?

A. Seeing that our Lord Jesus Christ is truth itself; there cannot be a doubt that he at the same time fulfils the promises which he there gives us, and adds the reality to the figures. Wherefore I doubt not that as he testifies by words and signs, so he also makes us partakers of his substance, that thus we may have one life with him.


Proofs | Search | Previous | Contents | Next